Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9227 14
Original file (NR9227 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HCG
Docket No. NR9227-14
18 May 2015

This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request dated
30 July 2014. You previously petitioned the Board and were advised in
our letter that your application had been denied.

Your current request has been considered by a three-member panel of
the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session on 15 May 2015. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted
in support of your application.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board determined that your statement that your discharge should be
recharacterized pursuant to Presidential Proclamation (PP 4313), even
though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to
establish the existence of material error or injustice. The Board
determined that your request did not meet the factors outlined in the
proclamation by the President. Accordingly, your application has been
denied.

In accordance with the foregoing, the Board determined that your
assertions were insufficient to warrant further consideration in your
ease. In this regard, in the absence of sufficiently material
evidence, for reconsideration, the decision of the Board is final, and
your only recourse would be to initiate action, at no cost to the
Board, to a court of appropriate jurisdiction.

Sincerely,

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4249 14

    Original file (NR4249 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You served for two years and 11 months without disciplinary incident, but during the period from 4 February 1966 to 2 November 1968, you had...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13252 14

    Original file (NR13252 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3481 14

    Original file (NR3481 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11606 14

    Original file (NR11606 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4331 14

    Original file (NR4331 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your most recent application based on the new evidence provided. In this regard, your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session on 24 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12100 14

    Original file (NR12100 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. ~ After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statement you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11076 14

    Original file (NR11076 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11689 14

    Original file (NR11689 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11978 14

    Original file (NR11978 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 7 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the documentation that you provided, even though not previously considered by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13226 14

    Original file (NR13226 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and the letter you...